Evaluate counterclaims

Key notes :

  • A counterclaim is an argument that opposes or disagrees with the original claim or position in an argument.
  • It presents a different viewpoint or perspective that challenges the main argument.

  • Evaluating counterclaims is crucial to strengthening your argument and showing that you’ve considered multiple perspectives.
  • It helps you understand the complexity of the issue and demonstrates fairness in your argument.

  • Identify the counterclaim: Clearly understand the opposing viewpoint being presented.
  • Analyze the counterclaim: Evaluate the strength of the counterclaim. Does it have credible evidence or is it based on weak reasoning?
  • Refute or accept the counterclaim: Decide whether to:
    • Refute: Show why the counterclaim is weak or unconvincing.
    • Accept: Acknowledge the counterclaim but explain why your original argument is still stronger or more convincing.

  • Refutation: Offer evidence or reasoning that directly disproves the counterclaim.
  • Concession: Acknowledge parts of the counterclaim that are valid, but explain why your position is more reasonable overall.
  • Compromise: In some cases, suggest a solution or middle ground that considers both the original claim and the counterclaim.

  • Claim: “Social media helps people stay connected.”
  • Counterclaim: “Social media causes people to feel isolated and lonely.”
  • Evaluation: You could acknowledge that social media can lead to isolation for some, but counter this by presenting evidence that shows how it can create communities and foster real-world connections.

  • Including and evaluating counterclaims makes your writing more persuasive because it shows you’ve considered the full scope of the issue.
  • It helps you anticipate what the audience might think or argue and provides you with an opportunity to address their concerns directly.

Learn with an example

➡️ Consider this claim:

Snakes make great pets because they are clean, low-maintenance animals.

Now consider how someone might argue against this.

Which sentence presents the stronger and more reasonable counterclaim to the above claim?

  • Snakes are too dangerous to keep as pets because cobras and rattlesnakes have deadly, venomous bites.
  • Snakes do not make good pets because they do not form strong emotional bonds with people the way dogs and cats do.

Consider the claim:

Snakes make great pets because they are clean, low-maintenance animals.

This is a strong counterclaim since it offers a reasonable challenge to the claim:

✔ Snakes do not make good pets because they do not form strong emotional bonds with people the way dogs and cats do.

This is not a strong counterclaim:

x Snakes are too dangerous to keep as pets because cobras and rattlesnakes have deadly, venomous bites. This counterclaim uses faulty reasoning. It incorrectly asserts that because certain types of snake are dangerous, all snakes make bad pets.

➡️ Consider this claim:

Breakfast is the best meal of the day because it’s a no-fuss meal that people can make easily and quickly.

Now consider how someone might argue against this.

Which sentence presents the stronger and more reasonable counterclaim to the above claim?

  • Dinner is the best meal of the day because people can take the time to make it special and savour it at the table with family or friends.
  • Dinner is the best meal of the day because it has become more acceptable to have breakfast foods like pancakes, eggs and waffles for dinner.

Consider the claim:

Breakfast is the best meal of the day because it’s a no-fuss meal that people can make easily and quickly.

This is a strong counterclaim since it offers a reasonable challenge to the claim:

✔ Dinner is the best meal of the day because people can take the time to make it special and savour it at the table with family or friends.

This is not a strong counterclaim:

x Dinner is the best meal of the day because it has become more acceptable to have breakfast foods like pancakes, eggs and waffles for dinner. This counterclaim uses faulty reasoning. The idea that eating breakfast foods makes dinner the best meal of the day actually supports the claim that breakfast is the best meal.

➡️ Consider this claim:

A ‘staycation’—a stay-at-home holiday from school or work—is more fun and relaxing than a typical holiday away from home.

Now consider how someone might argue against this.

Which sentence presents the stronger and more reasonable counterclaim to the above claim?

  • If you stay at home instead of going away, you could easily end up spending your ‘holiday’ doing housework.
  • There are plenty of charming, out-of-the-way places that you can easily get to by car if you don’t want to fly somewhere.

Consider the claim:

A ‘staycation’—a stay-at-home holiday from school or work—is more fun and relaxing than a typical holiday away from home.

This is a strong counterclaim since it offers a reasonable challenge to the claim:

✔ If you stay at home instead of going away, you could easily end up spending your ‘holiday’ doing housework.

This is not a strong counterclaim:

x There are plenty of charming, out-of-the-way places that you can easily get to by car if you don’t want to fly somewhere. This counterclaim does not directly address the claim. The claim is about whether staycations are better than travelling, not about whether driving is better than flying.

let’s practice!